Discussion about this post

User's avatar
tsunimee's avatar

Meg. I am in shock and going to need a moment to put some words together and respond properly to this. Wow. So overwhelmed right now 😭 Thank you. Thank you. THANK YOU

Jay Allen Ford's avatar

I read the movement from “paid to exist” to “she pays to exist” as the poem’s darkest turn.

At first, the employer appears to be paying for her capable presence. Gradually, we understand what she pays in return: sleep, flexibility, privacy, unobserved time, invented ambition, and repeated explanations for work she already knows how to do.

That inversion also clarifies why ten years of competence cannot protect her. The new system is not evaluating whether the work gets done. It is evaluating whether she performs productivity in the approved costume, tone, vocabulary, and paper trail. “A project due September, five days old and called behind” is especially sharp because it reveals an expectation designed to outpace accomplishment. She must remain perpetually deficient so that management can remain perpetually necessary.

The orderly rhyme resembles the “counting song” imposed upon her. Every line seems required to account for the next, just as every action must produce a ticket, box, form, goal, or explanation. “Do as you’re told” becomes the bureaucratic refrain beneath the annual ceremony of invented zeal.

Yet the ending does not give the workplace the whole poem. She will provide the hours she agreed to sell and let the tickets keep their administrative names. Then she will close the door and reclaim the hours they cannot legitimately possess.

Please keep writing into this territory, Meg. You have a gift for translating impersonal workplace systems into their intimate human cost. The screen, ticket, flexi balance, annual goals, dress, dinner, and an unanswered invitation from a friend show us exactly what bureaucracy consumes when it begins to treat a dependable human being as a problem requiring continuous documentation.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?